Question to John Burroughs

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Question to John Burroughs

Postby redsocks » Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:54 pm

Hi John,

Can I ask were you involved in the second night incident and if so can you explain how many people were involved that night and if you did or did not see Larry Warren.
Not digging mate I believe you did see something I would just like to know some facts about the second night.

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby redsocks » Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:06 pm

Silvertop wrote:Resocks,

Do you mean the third night (Halt night)? I believe the second night was just 'lights-in-the-sky' as it were.

St.

Hi Silvertop
I'm talking about the second craft encounter some days after the first and yes when Halt was involved(when he recorded etc),was John involved in that night?

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:08 pm

Good to talk to you again Redsocks

There were 3 nights. they happened back to back to back. Thur into Fri P,B and C. The second night was the one I found out about Fri into Sat when i went up to the LE desk Sat mourning and the desk Sgt told me they had a incident and let me read the blotter entry and report so I was not out there. The third night was Halts and Warren incident that I went out on because I wanted to see if whatever it was would come back again
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:10 pm

Also Warren would have been on duty because his flight would have been working. My flight went on break Friday mourning and we returned to duty Monday Swings.
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby redsocks » Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:26 pm

John, I would just like to mention to you that the forum here talk from time to time in PM's and we are convinced you saw something very strange and hopefully we here can help you with some ideas of what you may have seen from what we have investigated ourselves and I hope some of our ideas dont sound too crazy! apollo capsule,plane crash etc,its just our a process of elimination :D .

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby redsocks » Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:30 pm

John Burroughs wrote:Good to talk to you again Redsocks

There were 3 nights. they happened back to back to back. Thur into Fri P,B and C. The second night was the one I found out about Fri into Sat when i went up to the LE desk Sat mourning and the desk Sgt told me they had a incident and let me read the blotter entry and report so I was not out there. The third night was Halts and Warren incident that I went out on because I wanted to see if whatever it was would come back again



Hi John good to hear from you.

Can I ask you John outright did you see Larry Warren on the third night/do you think he was actually there?

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:20 pm

Redsocks
I totally understand the fact every possible angle should be looked at. As far as Warren goes I did not see him out there. I know he was not with Halts party but Bustina was. I cannot say for sure if in fact he was not out in the woods durning the incident. That is why I wish he would answer my questions because I would have a better understanding of what his involvement was!!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby redsocks » Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:54 pm

John Burroughs wrote:Redsocks
I totally understand the fact every possible angle should be looked at. As far as Warren goes I did not see him out there. I know he was not with Halts party but Bustina was. I cannot say for sure if in fact he was not out in the woods durning the incident. That is why I wish he would answer my questions because I would have a better understanding of what his involvement was!!


Hi John

Yeah I know where you are coming from there is always a lot of avoidance with LW,he only answers stuff with cant drop him in the ****

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby larry warren » Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:28 am

GUYS, GOT 3 POINTS OF SHIT KNOCKED OUT OF ME BY THE MERSEYSIDE pd,
jesus hates a pussy!
AND THESE COPS ARE PUSSEYS AND ARE CORROUPT , FUCK WITH THE RONG YANK! BITCH................................
ANYWAY I MAY BE OFF LINE FOR A BIT!
BEST TO YOU ALL! I WAS DEFINDING A GUY AGIANST SOME WANABE GANXTERS, USE TO WORK FOR THE bonaN ANO CREW
NOTHEN FA NOTHEN!
BRIT COPS ARE PUSSYS!
SEE YA WHEN I GET OUT!
LARRY 666
larry warren
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: england

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby Observer » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:13 am

Larry
Would that be Walton jail?
Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby larry warren » Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:25 pm

no mate,
i work doors, and with that comes lots of problems.
not all cops are bad, but ive met my share, in that roll.
no jail for me mate, i was just helping some guys that were getting wrongly
pasted, to old for that crap.
anyway ignor the previous post had a few and again got near the keyboard, woops!
my brotherin law is a us marshal, and a good guy, as im sure you are!
larry
larry warren
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: england

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby Observer » Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:13 pm

Larry
Big sigh of relief, i thought you were in trouble with the Plod.
Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby time4truth » Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:44 pm

hello John! pleased to "meet" you. do u know what was on film sent to Ramstein? any other photos of Incident?? asking hopefully! event must hav blon yr mind?!!
time4truth
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:29 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby Observer » Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:53 pm

I think Larry said it was tapes of the radio traffic that was recorded during those nights. May be wrong but Larry will confirm.
Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby robert » Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:03 pm

Obs.
Think it was John B who mentioned it being tapes rather than film.

Cheers
Robert
robert
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:53 am
Location: Sheffield. Yorkshire

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby Observer » Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:42 pm

Thanks Robert
I knew it was one or the other.
Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby puddlepirate » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:51 pm

Was it standard procudure to record all SP radio transmissions (voice?), with the tapes being kept for a defined period, perhaps three months, before being recorded over, just in case they were required as evidence at some point? If so, was it also standard procedure for all the tapes from all USAFE bases to be held at a central USAFE location, e.g. Ramstein AFB? If that were the case then this is of no special signifigance.
You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time (Winston Churchill)...causa latet, vis est notissima
puddlepirate
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:47 am
Location: UK

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby time4truth » Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:46 am

thnx 4 discussion guys!! so many interesting things...
time4truth
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:29 am

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby robert » Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:00 am

Think PP is on the button as usual with a bit of lateral thinking on why the tapes went to Headquarters if it was of no significance.

Mike Verrano is a key here, as is Gordon Williams. It would be good to ask John B, as he knew they were tapes rather than film, who he got this information from re the tapes or was it a direct observation by John B?

Robert
robert
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:53 am
Location: Sheffield. Yorkshire

Re: Question to John Burroughs

Postby Observer » Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:51 am

At the moment it seems to be only hearsay that audio tapes of the radio traffic between the SP's was sent to Germany. This needs to be clarrified.
I suspect it was not normal procedure but if an incident occurred it would be as the USAF legal department would want to scrutinise them in case there was any litigation ensuing from the incident.
This does suggest that this incident was of a serious nature if the tapes 'were' sent.

Clarify before judging.
Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Next

Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests