Admin went into one and the topic was banned - why?
Puddle
that Warren and colleagues were brought in to replace those sent home.
Puddle
...they are the co-ordinates for the road outside the Bull Hotel and if I were an American visiting Woodbridge, that is exactly the place I should choose to stay.
In a review in Magonia (No 74, April 2001) of Georgina Bruni’s You Can’t Tell The People, Peter Rogerson, admittedly with some exaggeration, put it this way:
...if you were the USAF or the British or American governments and you were pushed to into an absolute corner, which story would cause you the most embarrassment in the tabloids: “Drug crazed American servicemen fired on a lighthouse thinking it was an ALIEN SPACESHIP (shock horror), and these are the men guarding the CRUISE MISSILES” (even more shock horror); or, “Brave lightly armed US servicemen confront an ALIEN SPACESHIP, risking all to do their sacred duty and protect their precious charge”. No real contest is it? True or not, the first headline invites in all sorts of real investigative journalists, sniffing out tales of sex,9drugs and rock’n’roll, and a state of affairs too close to Bilko for comfort. The second invites cranks and makes sure that real journalists stay far away
DP
Who is Peter Rogerson? and whats he got to do with anything that relates to the forum other than reviewing Georgini Bruni's book
DP
Firing at lighthouse--- nobody reported hearing gun fire and I would imagine the noise of an M16 being shot at night would travel several miles. Also if somebody targeted the Lighthouse with another weapon lots of other reasons for the accident rather than blaming a UFO, which would always attract so much attention.
Peter Rogerson, admittedly with some exaggeration, put it this way:....
True or not, the first headline invites in all sorts of real investigative journalists, sniffing out tales of sex,9drugs and rock’n’roll, and a state of affairs too close to Bilko for comfort.
DP
The fact that the disinformation campaign used a UFO suugests that it was something physical to be seen, eg aircraft, spyplane , spydrone or weapon system that produced bizarre effects-- which one might attribute to a ufo. It was a seed that was planted for future denialbility.
If it was just a simple ordnance recovery why not just say special forces were practising an assualt against an airbase?
DP
The fact that the disinformation campaign used a UFO suugests that it was something physical to be seen, eg aircraft, spyplane , spydrone or weapon system that produced bizarre effects-- which one might attribute to a ufo. It was a seed that was planted for future denialbility.
Return to The December 2010 Conference
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests