30 year reunion

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:37 pm

Very little the shift commander went out when there was lights spotted in the forrest. According to what i was told she had a problem when her jeeped shut down and a Blue light went through her jeep.
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:54 pm

Aha, now that makes perfect sense to me now. Thankyou for explaining that, John. I always thought yourself and Halt were involved on the 'second night', however, i've just red the bit in Bruni's book...'John Burroughs was NOT on duty during the rest of Christmas week, but on the night of the SECOND MAJOR encounter (which he believes took place on the THIRD night, 27/28.'

She didn't put those four words into bold type in her book, but i did it, because that is what has confused me. I hadn't red it closely enough, and that is what had confused me. Not that difficult for me i'm afraid :)
Last edited by Andy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby puddlepirate » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:01 pm

Andy.. thanks for that.

Re routes into the forest. I have no idea if this route was there in 1980 but dead opposite Folly House is a wide ride that goes all the way up, almost to the northwest corner of the farmer's field. It's wide enough to drive a couple of tanks in line abreast along it and it's where the concrete manhole covers are sited about 150 yards apart - which follow the ride for most of its length.

I've got some phots of it but can't work out how to post images!
You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time (Winston Churchill)...causa latet, vis est notissima
puddlepirate
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:47 am
Location: UK

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby AdrianF » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:04 pm

John Burroughs wrote:Do you remember when he described the route and would they be able to get the lighalls and equipment in the same area we were in or was it where Halt said he was? And can you show on the map also where Halt has said he was when he was first investigating the incident?


I've gone from Larry's account in LAEG. I will look back over one of his earlier interviews tonight to see if he mentioned this there.
Ian R gives a good account on his site of how Col. Halt went into the forest. I looked at Ian's map today and it does tally with what I'm suggesting:

http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2d.htm

Lighalls could easily have been taken down that route, and the landing site from there (the south side) is not that far into the forest

Not being a military guy myself I can't really suggest what would be proper procedure, but from a common sense point of view, this would be the logical way of getting this kind of machinery into this position.
AdrianF
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:57 pm

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:07 pm

puddlepirate wrote:Andy.. thanks for that.

Re routes into the forest. I have no idea if this route was there in 1980 but dead opposite Folly House is a wide ride that goes all the way up, almost to the northwest corner of the farmer's field. It's wide enough to drive a couple of tanks in line abreast along it and it's where the concrete manhole covers are sited about 150 yards apart - which follow the ride for most of its length.

I've got some phots of it but can't work out how to post images!


Not sure PP. Adrian would probably be able to answer that as he has the maps. I do remember walking down route 10 though with BB and pointing out to her the site that Bruni shows on the map in her book which she claimed Vince Thurkettle showed her. However, she said to me 'Nothing happened the other side of route 10.'
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:13 pm

AdrianF wrote:
John Burroughs wrote:Do you remember when he described the route and would they be able to get the lighalls and equipment in the same area we were in or was it where Halt said he was? And can you show on the map also where Halt has said he was when he was first investigating the incident?


I've gone from Larry's account in LAEG. I will look back over one of his earlier interviews tonight to see if he mentioned this there.
Ian R gives a good account on his site of how Col. Halt went into the forest. I looked at Ian's map today and it does tally with what I'm suggesting:

http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham2d.htm

Lighalls could easily have been taken down that route, and the landing site from there (the south side) is not that far into the forest

Not being a military guy myself I can't really suggest what would be proper procedure, but from a common sense point of view, this would be the logical way of getting this kind of machinery into this position.


Mr Ridpath certainly do seem to be in the same area too, and describes, that until now elusive track that Tex showed me, and John also mentions in his statement. I think what has confused us for a long time is that we have assumed John et al went down what was route 12. They didn't, but i really am convinced Larry Warren did. Things so seem to be slotting more into place now.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:21 pm

It's getting late now Adrian, and have to work tomorrow, but i'm reminded of one or two mentions of that track in BB's book 'Sky Crash.' If i get time tomorrow i shall have a good read through, and find the bits i am talking about and quote them. It would also seem to back up what you are saying.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby AdrianF » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:35 pm

I think what has confused us for a long time is that we have assumed John et al went down what was route 12. They didn't, but i really am convinced Larry Warren did


I always assumed this too, or that there were different sites being investigated, but now I'm convinced that the old road was the route in on night one and on subsequent nights, the 2 main logging roads were probably used.
AdrianF
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:57 pm

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:46 pm

It all makes sense to me now, and i've just been re-reading the witness statements, and again NOW, in light of what you have said, and what i have also thought for a while, they DO make sense, and are accurate.

In Bruni's book:
'Penniston looked down the perimeter road and could see what appeared to be different coloured lights.....'

Going on the previous assumption of what was route 12 and some distance down the road on the right, i had always found this confusing, as there is no way he would have seen those lights from East gate to route 12? However, the elusive logging track/path, yes most definitely he would be able to.

'The patrol then turned right (at the end of the East gate road) and, taking a SHARP LEFT turn (if they had gone to route 12 it would not have been a sharp left by any stretch of the imagination, but the path we are talking about WOULD be a sharp left) drove up the adjacent logging road into the forest, but due to the rocky terrain they had to abandon the vehicle and proceed on foot.'

I'm just so glad you made your initial posting Adrian, because as said i had come to the same and similar conclusions a while back, but it is so good to hear someone else saying the same and have come to the same conclusions. It makes me feel all that more certain that what i have been thinking, and you obviously are too, is in fact correct.
Last edited by Andy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:47 pm

Adrian
Can you post on the map where Halt saw the red glowing object that broke into different lights. Also where he had the blue light beame down the light!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:17 am

Here it is Adrian. Sky Crash page 187.

'They parked by the East gate of the base and Chuck (Halt's son) led the team along a dark track that paralled the main dirt road (route 12?) into the forest. With schoolboy enthusiasm he explained that this was the way the men from the gate had come...... Chuck said he had often been to the site since his father had first showed it him, and he could remember landmarks well, despite the dark. He pointed these out as he SURGED ON THROUGH THE TALL GRASS.' ?? Could this have been the small open field John mentions?? and you have also mentioned in your post and on the map :)

There is another mention of the track if i recall somewhere else in the book involving Halt himself, as said it is late though and you have kept me up far too late with your inspiration. And if i'm late for work tomorrow, God help you! :)

Catch up tomorrow.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:41 am

Adrian, do you live near, or actually in Ipswich or surrounding areas? If so, how about going to Rendlesham together? (If so PM me and i will give you my number). Probably a difficult task, as i have seen the track from the road and we would probably go over very rough terrain in our investigation, but how about trying to follow the said track, weaving in and out of the now planted trees in our path and see where it leads us to? You up for it? An interesting expriment?
I wont take my three greyhounds because the last time i took them deep within during my investigations, they came across an adder, and sight hounds are notoriously quick, but luckily i grabbed them in time, and it slithered away. However, having said that, there is a small part of Rendlesham (on route 12 up near the farmer's field) i want to show you, (and just beyond LW's staging post that he describes), and my dogs have regularly acted really strangely there, and compasses will go hay-wire, and mobile phones react. You have to witness it to believe it, but various others have.

What do you think? Sounds great fun to me, and we could also investigate capel green 'Lion's corner' etc.

If interested, as said PM me. If you live out of area, no problem, i have a spare room you are welcome to stay in whilst visiting the area.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby AdrianF » Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:50 am

Can you post on the map where Halt saw the red glowing object that broke into different lights. Also where he had the blue light beame down the light!


John, I've always assumed that this was on the other side of the farmers field, going by the tape recording. I will add to the map over time to include the second night, but as I said earlier I am still unsure of the route that you all took beyond the farmhouse on both nights. As this hasn't really changed over the years, at least you stand some chance of recalling your steps when you visit.

'The patrol then turned right (at the end of the East gate road) and, taking a SHARP LEFT turn (if they had gone to route 12 it would not have been a sharp left by any stretch of the imagination, but the path we are talking about WOULD be a sharp left) drove up the adjacent logging road into the forest, but due to the rocky terrain they had to abandon the vehicle and proceed on foot.'

Andy, thanks, the more I think about this the more it makes perfect sense. I'll be going down there again later this week, so if you want to meet up and go over this then great, will pm you
AdrianF
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:57 pm

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby puddlepirate » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:54 am

for info.. with regard to logging roads wide enough for vehicles towing lightalls: The only one I am aware of that exists today is the one opposite the end of Woodbridge runway, between Folly House and the landing lights. Of course there could well have been others in 1980 but i believe when I suggested mobile Cruise missile launchers might be involved Obs stated that in 1980 the logging roads were only 8ft wide so too narrow for any vehicles other than logging equipment.

Looking towards the runway: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31080006@N07/3826123066
Looking towards the farmer's field: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31080006@N07/3826122638
and a couple of close ups of the manhole covers:http://www.flickr.com/photos/31080006@N07/3825323009
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31080006@N07/3825322787
You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time (Winston Churchill)...causa latet, vis est notissima
puddlepirate
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:47 am
Location: UK

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:19 am

What was route 12 is also wide enough PP. I very much doubt they were eight feet wide if you think about it. They were logging roads, so had to be wide enough to take vehichles down to collect the trunks taken down from logging. Take a look at the photos in BB's book skycrash. There is one of a Japanese tv crew on the route 12. That logging road was definitely not only eight feet wide.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby puddlepirate » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:59 am

Hi Andy

I've got no idea.. Obs was quite adamant that they were only 8ft wide...don't know if he posted that info or PM'd it. I thought it odd but Obs is local to the area and knows it well... grew up there apparently. I'm not familiar with either the area or the logging roads so can't really comment as to how wide the logging roads were in 1980 or what type of logging equipment was used. Obs suggested they used chainsaws to fell the trees and trailers hauled by small tractors to move the trunks around but as I say, I've absolutely no idea so I bow to the superior knowledge of those like yourself who know the area well.

I suppose as far as the RFI goes it would depend on where they wanted the kit. They'd take the vehicles down the route that was easiest and nearest to wherever the kit needed to be. After all they would need to turn the vehicles and lightalls around to get them out. Once the location of the incident had been confirmed by foot patrols, they could take the vehicles down whatever route suited them best. So I suppose in that context just because the guys on foot took route 12 it doesn't mean the vehicles did.
You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time (Winston Churchill)...causa latet, vis est notissima
puddlepirate
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:47 am
Location: UK

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby puddlepirate » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:16 pm

For info. The National Archive is holding two files on the RFI which are retained under the 30 year rule. There is supposed to be a release of additional info tomorrow, Monday, so perhaps these are the documents to be released. As it stands at the moment both are exempt from the FoI Act...

DEFE 24/1948

Scope and content UFO reports of sighting: Rendlesham Forest, December 1981
Covering dates 1992 Jan 01 - 2002 Dec 31
Availability Closed Or Retained Document, Open Description, Closed For 30 years
Former reference (Department) D/Sec(AS) 12/2/1 Part A
Held by The National Archives, Kew

The above also applies to this document:

DEFE 24/1948/1 which is the same as the above but with redactions

Notice the date.. 1981 NOT 1980

Just in case these are not being released, I have requested a review.
You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time (Winston Churchill)...causa latet, vis est notissima
puddlepirate
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:47 am
Location: UK

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby Andy » Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:53 pm

I hadn't really given it much consideration, and have looked at the photo numerous times, but take a look Adrian in GB's book. There is a photo 'Rendlesham Forest as seen from the East Gate; taken by Adrian Bustinza a week after the incident (January 1981)

You can see the logging path in question.

What had also confused me was the drawings/maps giving directions to the landing site, made my Penniston. But they too now make sense. Until recently i had always thought that once they came to the end of East gate road, took a right, then turned into the forest, was too soon and route 12 would not be that close on the scale of things. They most definitely went down that track. No doubt about it. Penniston also said they took a true East direction whilst on that track. All we need to do now is try (probably will be impossible) is as said follow it and see where it leads us to?

Also in Sky crash, the photo i mention in a previous post about the Japanese crew on route 12? Underneath the photo it gives the description 'Japanese TV producer Jim Yaoi, pictured with his camera crew in January 1984 during the making of their documentary on the sky crash. They are at the 'staging post' described by Art Wallace (LW). Trucks and jeeps were left here and the security officers approached the site on foot, through the trees to the left of the picture.'


I can't find that bit about Halt Senior showing BB the site? I'm sure i red it somewhere. The only other book i have is UFO crash landing, so perhaps it was in there? I shall have to have a look through that.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Re: 30 year reunion

Postby AdrianF » Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:49 pm

Also in Sky crash, the photo i mention in a previous post about the Japanese crew on route 12? Underneath the photo it gives the description 'Japanese TV producer Jim Yaoi, pictured with his camera crew in January 1984 during the making of their documentary on the sky crash. They are at the 'staging post' described by Art Wallace (LW). Trucks and jeeps were left here and the security officers approached the site on foot, through the trees to the left of the picture.'


I remember this photo, but don't remember the quote, which does support the idea that the lightalls were put into this area via what was track 12. Look forward to maybe meeting up this week..

PP, thanks for the nod on the MOD files
AdrianF
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:57 pm

Re: Orienteering

Postby Andy » Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:51 pm

AdrianF wrote:I walked over the area again yesterday, this time only reading the three original statements and a forest planting map as a guide. I now think that the FC were pretty close with their calculation as was Brenda Butler and I think that Jim Penniston should be forgiven for identifying a second site and with good reason ( apologies to Jim if it seems I'm putting words in his mouth ). I've come to this conclusion after being given a planting map by the FC, which shows how the designated areas were planted by year and tree type.

My aim is to produce a reasonably accurate animatic of the events from this planting map, using the original statements as a guide. All later comments I'm excluding, as the forest appears to have changed so much during the 80's that it would require a huge effort to recall exact locations. Having said that, most of the later statements now seem to make perfect sense including Larry Warrens route into the forest and the area where the lightalls were probably positioned on the 3rd night.

I've created a very rough overlay map, which I hope should give some idea of what I think might have happened here and why there is still so much confusion. IMO this stands the best chance of being resolved with the use of photographs or film footage from the time, as this will confirm how this particular part of the forest looked back then.

Image

The area ringed in white is the approximate area now known as the landing site, the one investigated by Verano and Gulyas and subsequently Halts team. It potentially could have been a little further east, but is more or less what most people agree on being the landing site area.

The X marked A seems to be the area JP sketched in the statements. It should have looked then much like the X marked B does now, hence the confusion.

The 1st area ringed in green which was replanted in 75 is very likely the area referred to as the first clearing or field crossed.

The 2nd area ringed in green containing the landing site, was most likely the forest that was passed through before entering the second field.

The route taken beyond the farm house is still a little confusing, but I would think could be solved as this has changed very little to my knowledge.

Going over the statements at the site, they are actually quite accurate accounts of the ground covered, particularly John's statement.


On your aerial map, you very clearly show the now non-existent path. Going on a bit further down the road from where that enters the forest you come to what was route 12. Follow that along and you will see it suddenly forks in two. That is where LW's staging post was and where we believe the lightalls were stationed. If you look over to the left of this, you will see the close proximity of the landing site, and how the lightalls could have quite easily illuminated the area. At that forked staging post site, from there onwards and continuing on the route 12 path down to the farmer's field is the area i told you about with dogs acting strangely, compasses, and mobile phones mal-functioning etc. I've always wondered if this is the area Andrew Sheepshanks told GB about, and 'had found very spooky.... (and) As a youngster he would often walk his dogs through the forest, but it seems they would never go anywhere near this particular spot.' ??

Strange that even today odd phenomenon still happen as described above, and that it is so close to the landing sites also, both JB & JP's and LW's?
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

PreviousNext

Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests