arvd wrote:I dare say you would in some ways love to be PROVEN wrong.
IanR wrote:There could of course be other things that I haven’t thought of. Any ideas?
on the Woodbridge base it [map] actually said it: non - nuclear - weapons - storage - area. And on Bentwaters we had weapons storage area.
larry warren wrote:Further, you can see what im talkin about, you will ATTACK , ATTACK , ATTACK ! but NONE OF YOU WILL FACE THE FACTS NOR WILL YOU ASK THE QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ASKED ! Ill Bet 1000 pounds !Silver yer good ! but this thread will now go dead ! cause its the home of D E B U N K E R S !!.Chicken shit high ! WE WIN !
larry warren wrote:you guys are such detectives ! but do you know the story ? what do you know ? and do ya all think ill bend over backward for you monkeys ! shit no !! i love to mess with ya and i hope john n jim start to do the same ! WEb WIN !
larry warren wrote:misrepresenting ones intentions is the SAD thing, Steve. cheers
larry warren wrote:silver, i dont know how to put pictures on the web ! and the photo in question needs to be looked at it sure aint a light house!
Return to The Rendlesham forest incident
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest