Project Condign & UAP

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Project Condign & UAP

Postby Observer » Mon May 22, 2006 12:08 pm

Hi everyone

I feel that it needs to be said to those few individuals who claim a helicopter or aircraft landed/crashed in the forest. It was impossible.

The fire breaks were just not wide enough even for a small single seat helicopter. The risk of tearing off the rotor blades on the adjacent trees was too great.

The only place that a 'chopper' could have landed was in the nearby field. So claiming that the 3 indentations in the ground were from a chopper is logically impossible. Unless of course you are hiding the wreckage of the helicopter? There would be plenty of wreckage and not all of it would be immediately traceable.

I'm surprised no body has said it was a Harrier Jump jet that had landed/crashed.

This whole helicopter thing is a non runner.

The MOD's lengthy memo about this incident does not add up considering that Jim Penniston actually touched the UFO. I would like to meet the people who have advised the MOD that all this phenomena was down to balls of light plasma. Lets have some genuine scientists from the Royal Collage of science, DERA or a university giving us their views.

My first question to them is: Jim Penniston touched this object in the forest, it had a hard surface and was a nuts and bolts thing. "Can you explain what he touched"?

Observer
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests