MIND Control

[robert]

Atlantic Monthly, The Zap Gap, March 1987 by Chuck de Caro, p. 28;

''There have been many far-out hypothetical armaments in the news since Star Wars went from being a movie to being a weapons system, so it is perhaps understandable that when Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger made a clipped reference in a 1983 speech to "radio-frequency weapons," reaction was minimal. The last thing most congressmen and commentators want is another sheaf of physics equations to sift through. Yet radio-frequency (RF) weapons, which are rarely mentioned in the general press, appear closest to realization than the energy beams and supermissiles of Star Wars."

There are over 25 articles from the 1970s to the 1990s on Russia, once a super power and it's development of this technology. See Articles on Russian Mind Control and Electromagnetic Technologies, 1997 Fort Bragg, CA, Flatland Books. Walter Bowart's Operation Mind Control 1978, discussed Vietnam veteran accounts of the use of mind control technology. David Guyatt wrote an article on Feb. 1996 for the International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium. The Symposium was entitled The Medical Profession and the Effects of Weapons. Guyatt reported in 1989 that a Department of Defense medical engineer "sourced a story claiming that the context of conditioning, microwaves and other modalities had regularly been used against the Palestinians.

The new weapons are revolutionary and affect every citizen's future. The New York Times, Dec. 29, 1965 p 28 covered the speakers at an American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting. It was entitled "Controlling the Mind". Prof. David Krech of the University of California suggested that probable future capabilities for controlling human minds contain more serious implications than even the successes of the nuclear physicists." ...time must not be wasted if these new capabilities are to be harnessed for the benefit of free societies rather than perverted to destroy them and enslave their citizens." Public input and discussion of the development of these new weapons and their use should belatedly begin.

Two points are critical to remember. One, the government is torturing U.S. citizens with this technology and two, the U.S. public has the right to have a say in the use and development of this technology. This is a massive human rights violation actively covered up by the U.S government. For the last 50 years, electromagnetic and neurological weapon testing programs have been classified under the national security act according to government policy. So it is imperative that the U.S. public demand that it be declassified. In the meantime, the U.S. public can review the factual and documented information on this government policy and decide for themselves.''