by puddlepirate » Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:17 pm
One thing I have always thought to be really odd about the whole affair is Col Halt's memo appearing a couple of years later and only after an FoI request to the US DoD - who then went to the trouble of contacting MoD.
The memo itself is not particularly interesting in so far as it only really mentions 'odd lights'. All documents, signal messages, message tapes (as used in the 1980's) and so forth had defined retention periods after which time they would be routinely destroyed in accordance with routine and emergency destruction protocols. The usual retention period for unclassified routine documents such as inter-office memos (which in reality is what the Halt memo is) was anything from 30 days to three months or perhaps six months in some circumstances. For the Halt memo to have been retained by MoD for such an exceptionally long period, particularly after MoD were satisfied that the event was of 'no defence significance' is somewhat odd. To me it suggests the memo was actually written in response to the FoI request, i.e. it was written some years after the event (which might account for the discrepancies in the dates) and produced for the sole purpose of diverting the attention of over-zealous UFO researchers..... something it has succeeded in doing remarkably well.
If the memo was not written in response to the FoI request then the fact that MoD held on to it for so long and that the US MoD knew the UK MoD had a file (or even if they thought MoD might have a file) suggests that both the DoD and the MoD know more than they are letting on. If that is true, then I suspect it would be nothing to do with UFOs and possibly not even referred to as the Rendlesham Forest incident but something else entirely. If it is not true that DoD and MoD know more then they are telling then the original FoI request would simply have received the usual negative response. Perhaps someone was trying a bit too hard and in so doing, inadvertently opened a can of worms!!
Why dld the DoD bother to forward the request to MoD? As anyone who has experience of submitting FoI requests knows, if information does not exist the the usual response is 'we do not hold that information' or similar. Alternative sources might be offered but there is no responsibility to contact other organisations on behalf of the person submitting the request. The fact that the US DoD contacted the UK MoD is also odd and lends weight to the 'they know more than they are telling' theory.
Therefore, it would be very useful indeed for those directly involved to attend a reunion where answers to such conundrums might be found. It has long been my belief that the whole RFI story as we know it, i.e. the UFO explanation to cover the events that actually occurred in the forest, is nothing more than a red herring.
You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time (Winston Churchill)...causa latet, vis est notissima