What cover up

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Re: What cover up

Postby Beentheredonethat » Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:54 am

Question to any RFI responder who knows the following facts!
I need Info, more input, more input! :(
J.B. or L.W. or Battista, or any S.P. who will try to help me with some facts. 8) Was there a side arm lost at some point ? At what point? Was this (potential) side arm found? Who could have lost it? What part in the RFI investigation did that female Lt., (who was having trouble with her radio), have in the search for lights? Could the missing side Arm have been hers? :oops: Any Help with this would be appreciated I don't know my RFI story and have not read the Left at East Gate Book, sorry :oops: but I am interested in learning more about the facts in this story. I'm having trouble with what are the facts and what are not!
Please help! I am loosing sleep trying to piece this story together. :cry:
TTFN,
BTDT
Beentheredonethat
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:18 am

Re: What cover up

Postby Beentheredonethat » Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:24 am

Silvertop, :D Mabey OBS can shine a light on info about that torch, very good , no pun intended right!
I guess all those S.P.'s, or witnesses are all on vacation or don't need to talk to a newby! Come on no one else knows!
Thanks for the info and getting back with me Silvertop, Observers, not sure, isn't interested, I think he's got some other project he's getting busy with. I can't figure out if the lost sidearm was a rumor or not! Also, the mention of that lady Lt. who freaked out and loosing radio contact and all contact :shock: for a while has me wondering why? Why was she relieved of her command :roll: . What did she do wrong? Not cause she lost a torch! Was it, she was not in contact with her people? Did she get lost in the woods and then she found something that she could not explain and she went koo koo? :cry: ? I'm trying to figure out why she had to be taken out of the picture, was she going crazy from this, (RFI)! Hell I'm going crazy trying to figure out what happened those nights. I don't wan't to read Larry Warrens book I'm afraid I might have a one sided view. I'm trying to look at this open minded. We all know that we should not have been off base in the forrest without the local authorities, I don't get the silence for a lot of whatever. Where's the Lt now?
Any help from anyone in the know would be helpful !!
Goin nuts here,
BTDT
Beentheredonethat
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:18 am

Re: What cover up

Postby Observer » Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:40 am

Hi

I wasn't going to bother putting any posts on the forum in the New Year as my personal opinion is that its got no where and probably never will so any contribution i make will be of little use.
However, re the the torch just to help out.
A friend of mine and his young son who live in the Woodbridge area went into the woods a few days after the alleged incident and they found a USAF SP's issue torch fitted with a red lens filter lying in the short grass on the edge of a logging track. He took it home and still has it today.

I asked my friend why did he go in the woods and was it because of the UFO incident? he said he was told about the incident by a USAF friend of his in the ARRS and it was an excuse to walk the dogs, and that folks was before any one was told such as Brenda Butler etc. My friend who walks his dogs [2 border Collies] on a regular basis in Rendlesham Forest said the forest seemed absolutely normal to him and other dog walkers who he meets up with said the same. Some of these dog walkers walked their dogs during the days between the nights in question and i mentioned this in some posts last year.
Even forestry workers who he was pals with said that they had seen nothing unusual and wondered what all the fuss was about.

Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: What cover up

Postby Observer » Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:37 am

Just one more thing before i sign off.

This is a part quote from Ian Ridpath who i'm sure won't mind me saying this.

So far, the security Policeman Sgt Kevin Konde is the only person who has come forward to admit pulling a hoax on the guards at the gate. His stunt involved switching on his patrol car's coloured roof lights and spot lights and driving round in circles inside the air base on a perimeter track at night. While I'm happy to accept that he did do what he said he did, I'm satisfied that it was on a different occasion to the famous alleged UFO sightings, so was not the direct cause of the case we are discussing. However, it could have inspired other people to pull a similar and perhaps more elaborate stunt but this time off base in the forest.
I think this is a perfectly reasonable assumption [although not proven] considering the movies that were playing on the Ipswich cinemas over the Christmas holidays.
Until some one owns up to this it can only be speculation.

According to all the witnesses, there were over the 2 or 3 nights scores of people out in the forest or gathered round East Gate and tracks leading to the forest, yet only a tiny handful [our main witnesses] have come forward to say any thing. The rest [the majority] have seen fit for reasons only known to them have not come forward to say anything.

I will end by saying that in my estimation the only reason that many people were out in the forest was because they were searching for some thing that had been dropped/lost by an SP. You can make your own mind up as to what that was.
Thats it from me, no more posts. if i can be of any help PM me.

Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: What cover up

Postby time4truth » Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:00 pm

Obs r u infering that the TORCH found with RED FILTER was what Cln Halt described as "sot of like an eye winkin at you"?? Is the FAMOUS Halt Tape a complete FAKE to make us public believe UFO story !!??? soo confusing.... :?:
time4truth
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:29 am

Re: What cover up

Postby Observer » Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:24 pm

time4truth

Not at all, i suggested some time ago that it was only a possibility that the red light that Halt saw blinking at him from a distance away in the forest could have been an SP's torch fitted with a red filter over the lens.
That's a perfectly reasonable explanation, but has to remain conjecture until it is proved.
As i said in my recent post, a friend of mine found a USAF issue torch in the forest a few days after the incident. He showed it to me earlier this year.
There were probably many SP's out in the forest with issue torches and red filters.

I am not suggesting that anything has been faked, that is for you to decide.

Obs
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Re: What cover up

Postby time4truth » Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:18 pm

OOOh!! Obs this RFI just gets more and more intriging.. id just sooo luv to KNOW :D
time4truth
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:29 am

Previous

Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests