CIA using us

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Postby ghaynes » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:02 pm

Observer wrote:Hi Graham

I think i got confused with another weapon that we had. It was a large flatish container with lots of small bomblets in it, i thought it Pave Way but obviously not. I know that the Hunting aircraft company were the developers and we tested it on Salisbury Plain. It was rather nasty.

Observer


Hi Observer,
That was the JP233...also carried by Tornados.
Regards.

Graham
Visit Bentwaters Aviation Society on the web:
http://www.bentwaters-as.org.uk
http://www.bcwm.org.uk
User avatar
ghaynes
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:11 am
Location: Rendlesham

Postby Observer » Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:21 am

Hi silvertop

Makes you think, doesn't it. Some thing this size/weight coming down in the forest would surely have flattened a few trees and would have broken up on contact with the trees. Its worth chasing up though.

Observer
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Postby redsocks » Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:28 pm

Hi Graham,


Can I ask you if there is any evidence of Aurora was flying in the late 70's early 80's, and what dates were the SR-71 based at RAF Mildenhall?
When I was a kid I used to live at RAF Wattisham as my dad was based there,one evening at late dusk whilst being where I shouldnt I am pretty sure I saw either the SR-71 or Aurora do one pass across the runway and went,this would have been in the late 70's I guess.

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Postby Observer » Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:32 pm

Hi redsocks

Can i jump in before Graham answers. The word Aurora was a generic term used as a cover for several high speed programs, Check the net.

Observer
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Postby redsocks » Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:48 pm

Check out "Aurora aircraft" on wikipedia.org,theres some very interesting facts about unmanned ariel vehicles and recon satellites.

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Postby Observer » Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:16 pm

Some of the russian Zenit and Voskhod space vehicles/spy satellites look similar to Penniston's description. Dates need to be checked against Russian usage.
Check out the web sites, they make interesting reading especially the on board recovery systems.

Observer
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Postby Observer » Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:30 pm

Hi silvertop

Just type in google, Russian space craft re entry modules, check Soyuz, Voskhod and Zenit, check the pictures and diagrams.

Observer
Observer
 
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Woodbridge Suffolk, now London.

Postby ghaynes » Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:39 am

redsocks wrote:Hi Graham,


Can I ask you if there is any evidence of Aurora was flying in the late 70's early 80's, and what dates were the SR-71 based at RAF Mildenhall?
When I was a kid I used to live at RAF Wattisham as my dad was based there,one evening at late dusk whilst being where I shouldnt I am pretty sure I saw either the SR-71 or Aurora do one pass across the runway and went,this would have been in the late 70's I guess.

Redsocks


Hi Redsocks,
Sorry, I appear to have missed this post from you. There's far to many active threads for me to keep track of!
Det4, 9th SRW operated SR-71s at Mildenhall from April 1979 to 18 January 1990.
Regards.

Graham
Visit Bentwaters Aviation Society on the web:
http://www.bentwaters-as.org.uk
http://www.bcwm.org.uk
User avatar
ghaynes
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:11 am
Location: Rendlesham

Postby redsocks » Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:35 pm

ghaynes wrote:
redsocks wrote:Hi Graham,


Can I ask you if there is any evidence of Aurora was flying in the late 70's early 80's, and what dates were the SR-71 based at RAF Mildenhall?
When I was a kid I used to live at RAF Wattisham as my dad was based there,one evening at late dusk whilst being where I shouldnt I am pretty sure I saw either the SR-71 or Aurora do one pass across the runway and went,this would have been in the late 70's I guess.

Redsocks


Hi Redsocks,
Sorry, I appear to have missed this post from you. There's far to many active threads for me to keep track of!
Det4, 9th SRW operated SR-71s at Mildenhall from April 1979 to 18 January 1990.
Regards.

Graham


Thanks Graham,


Just pick your brains again,is ther any chance that SR-71 landed at the twin bases?

Redsocks
redsocks
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:27 am

Postby ghaynes » Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:27 pm

redsocks wrote:
ghaynes wrote:
redsocks wrote:Hi Graham,


Can I ask you if there is any evidence of Aurora was flying in the late 70's early 80's, and what dates were the SR-71 based at RAF Mildenhall?
When I was a kid I used to live at RAF Wattisham as my dad was based there,one evening at late dusk whilst being where I shouldnt I am pretty sure I saw either the SR-71 or Aurora do one pass across the runway and went,this would have been in the late 70's I guess.

Redsocks


Hi Redsocks,
Sorry, I appear to have missed this post from you. There's far to many active threads for me to keep track of!
Det4, 9th SRW operated SR-71s at Mildenhall from April 1979 to 18 January 1990.
Regards

Graham


Thanks Graham,


Just pick your brains again,is ther any chance that SR-71 landed at the twin bases?

Redsocks


Yep, landed twice at Bentwaters following weather diverts from Mildenhall in the mid-80s. Believe I mentioned it in an earlier thread about the SR-71. We have photos of it at Bentwaters in the museum. It never landed at Woodbridge.
Regards.

Graham
Visit Bentwaters Aviation Society on the web:
http://www.bentwaters-as.org.uk
http://www.bcwm.org.uk
User avatar
ghaynes
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:11 am
Location: Rendlesham

Postby IanR » Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:17 am

Going back to a message you posted in January:
puddlepirate wrote:Source: The Times; Dec 9 1980; Page 6; Col E: (electronic and microfilm copies of The Times are available in almost all UK libraries so this can be verified)

Article headed: Polish crisis behind NATO decision to keep five-ship force together over Christmas holiday

"NATO's standing naval force in the north Atlantic is being kept in European waters instead of dispersing for Christmas, officials confirm here today......" the article goes on to say "...uncertainty over the outcome of the Polish crisis is the reason."
++++

STANAVFORLANT (Standing Naval Force Atlantic) comprised five ships. Amongst them were HMS Norfolk (UK) and USS Valdez (US) plus a Canadian ship HMCS Fraser. The Dutch and German ships which made up the remainder of the force sailed to their home ports but the British, US and Canadiian ships remained at Portsmouth, UK.

If the sitiuation was serious enough for STANAVFORLANT to remain in European waters then the situation was almost certainly serious enough for the two major USAF bases in the UK to be on alert.

I learnt recently that Dave Clarke had looked into this a while back. He has emailed me with what he found:
>>
On 5 July 2005 they [Royal Navy] sent me a copy of HMS Norfolk's logbook for 20-30 December 1980. For the entire Christmas week the ship was moored in dry dock in Portsmouth; no exercises, no sailings. Re my question for info on "any Royal navy exercises manouevres or operations that took place in the North Sea, English Channel or Thames Estuary, 20-30 December 1980" the answer was: "As you would expect the bulk of the non-deployed fleet was in port for Christmas leave. Exercise Teamwork 1980 included activity in the English Channel, but this took place in September."
<<
Make what you will of that reference to "non-deployed fleet".

Ian
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Previous

Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests