Bruni-Warren Confrontation

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Bruni-Warren Confrontation

Postby AzurWhyte » Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:11 pm

AzurWhyte
 

Postby AzurWhyte » Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:07 pm

Admin wrote:Hello AzurWhyte,
thankyou for posting that. :)


Georgina Bruni is very skeptical of Larry Warren's involvement.
I personally believe that he was involved in an event of some sort. I think that some of what he recalls may have been planted there by someone who would have the ability to do that. It's likely that the CIA could have done something to this effect.

By the way, I changed 'Captain Halt' to 'Colonel Halt' in the Wikipedia article.


Hello,

I personally agree 100% with you regarding Larry Warren, but, I would also add to your points that it is possible that he is lying to make money and for 15 minutes of fame or isan actual disinformation agent bought and paid for. Please, don't take these points of view on their own, they should be taken into consideration with your points I also think about.

If you can add anything to the Rendlesham Wikipedia article of the Bruni-Warren one then please do. Thanks for correcting that silly mistake of mine.
AzurWhyte
 

Postby Andy » Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:55 pm

Well, i wrote to Bruni, and she 'couldn't remember' the exact details apparently, of the initial landing site she was shown by Mr Thurkettle. I only asked a simple question ie 'was it just within the tree line?' (sue me if you must, but i have it on email). Granted, Warren has always remained constant in his belief, even if it has changed over the years, but he was around with his information of the Rendlesham incident, long before Bruni's book went to press. She ought to be grateful. If it wasn't for him, she probably wouldn't have a best selling book?
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Postby Andy » Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:15 am

I've just read Left at East Gate, once again (good read) as well as Skycrash and You can't tell the people. The more i read Larry Warren's book, the more i'm convinced he's telling the truth.

1. Skycrash:
A. Apparently there were two groups of men out in the woods the night of the initial landing? Steve Roberts (pseudonym) was apparently one of them? Interesting he's never said much more, or the other guys who were apparently with him? Who were they? :) Also the map he gave Brenda Butler et al, page 41 in Skycrash which apparently 'They direct from the road which passes Folly House and the track leading to East Gate and, if followed, one arrives at the landing site.' ???? Maybe i'm thick, but if anyone can work that diagram out please let me know, because to my reckoning, it doesn't lead to what is believed to be the initial landing site if following those instructions.

Until anyone can convince me otherwise, i'm not convinced there was a second group of men in the woods on that first night, or that Steve Roberts was even there? Heard it second hand, maybe?

2. If you read chapter one of Larry Warren's book (and know the area of Rendlesham he's talking about and the approximate distances he gives (Brenda Butler seems to think the 'staging post' is much further along the path, but in documentaries Larry Warren appears to disagree with this? and from his claim of where the 'staging post' was, his other approximate directions would be accurate and would take into account the first night's landing?... To my reckoning... but I may be wrong?

3. Also of interest, (to me, anyway :) ) is that Brenda Butler seems to think the site that Vince Thurkettle showed Bruni is nowhere near the site that Bruni Shows on her map in her book? I'm confused :)
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Postby Andy » Sat Jun 16, 2007 3:44 pm

That would be great, Admin, if you would do that sometime.
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Postby Andy » Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:42 pm

Thanks for that posting, Admin. From what i've seen, and knowing the forest, i would say i am correct; but strangely, Brenda Butler is seemingly wrong? I had seen clips of that video before, hence my understanding of the 'staging post' which where i believe it to be, would tie in accurately with the directions Larry Warren claims in his book. Brenda Butler's 'staging post' area does not tie in? , it is further along, on route 12 (now eight), according to her. Also, and however, despite Georgina Bruni's map of the landing site Vince Thurkettle showed her in the book, this too would seem to be different, and nowhere near where Ms Bruni describes, according to Brenda? Interesting to see Larry Warren back at the site though. Seemed a bit too confident to be making it up. Even a good liar couldn't muster that amount of confidence. Just leaves me wondering, whose memory is fading over time?
Andy
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:14 am
Location: Ipswich

Postby ppulatie » Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:43 am

Larry Warren is full of it. He was not involved. He was on the Main Gate, working alone, waving cars in. He had only been on base for three weeks.

For him to have been involved, he would have had to be replaced by another, more seasoned troop, and gone out there. This means that Penniston and Burroughs would have picked up Warren first, then responded.

Didn't happen.

Plus Warren's story changes over time. And he is the only one who has mentioned aliens, unless someone else is now reporting seeing them.

See my other posts and my introduction for more details about the events and my own perspective.
ppulatie
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:40 am


Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron