Redsocks
Ian Ridpath may still be vindicated with his light house theory.
Sorry Colonel, I've just realised that i was chasing a light house beam, we could never defend that.
Obs
Observer wrote:Redsocks
Ian Ridpath may still be vindicated with his light house theory.
Sorry Colonel, I've just realised that i was chasing a light house beam, we could never defend that.
Obs
Observer wrote:Redsocks
We could make this into a play, will you write the script, but i want production rites.
Obs
Observer wrote:Redsocks
Just be careful you don't nick any of Spielberg's script or we will both be in the mire.
Obs
Silvertop wrote:AdrianF wrote:On one of the breaks in the tape, there is a sound like a piano. When isolated it sounds to me like a C, then D, then E, followed by C again, it then drops an octave and goes up a perfect fifth....Adrian
Adrian . . . that's the theme from 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' - eeekk !
winkeech wrote:Hiya Adrian/Silvertop,
I did just post a reply, but gremlins seem to have eaten it, so If this appears twice you'll know why!
Ok, I've just joined photbucket so I can give links to the screengrabs I've just made.
It is over twenty years now since I had a chat with Charles Halt ... and so I can sympathise with contributors that were at the incident being expected to have total recall ... here is what I remember. Col Halt did show a pocket recorder to me for a few second and claimed it was the one he used. I have no reason to doubt him - and since he had taken the trouble to bring a cast of a landing mark with him, I think the odds are good. It seemed to be an early, well made olympus pearlcorder - I didn't take much note at the time other than thinking ' ah it's one of those'.
It is my opinion that the tape was previously recorded and that some of the odd noises that occasionally appear (piano music, footsteps etc) are either as a result of tape misalignment at stop/start points or bleedthrough when not completely over written when re-recorded (partial tape hysterysis).
Ok the spectrogram shows a well defined single tone at 1.9khz and a maximm recording bandwidth of around 6khz. This is what you would expect as top end response for a pocket recorder ... pretty good actually.
http://i481.photobucket.com/albums/rr173/winkeech/tone.jpg
The peripheral sound levels seem remarkably high for a simple omni mic - I don't know the provenance of the tape, but it looks to me as though the audio was run through a compressor and a noise filter prior to mp3 compression. That would make sense.
I then made a recording of the sound made by a gen 1 plus scope - recorded at a distance of half to one inch away from the scope body. I have uploaded it here on youtube:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=10c7BEEG_cA
as you can hear it has a much wider sound spectrum than the single tone on Halt's recording and generaly sounds lower ... but there is a single tone peak at around 3khz, which can be seen on the spectrogram ... which is here at:
http://i481.photobucket.com/albums/rr173/winkeech/experiment.jpg
As we can see, the overall frequency response of this recorder is identical to Halt's original (around 6 khz top end) and so it looks as though he really did record it on his pocket recorder ... or went to a lot of trouble and fine detail in a studio afterwards ... for me, everything points to it being as he described - nothing I see here contradicts his assertation.
Hope that is of some help,
and I hope the reply posts correctly this time!
best wishes, Win.
Return to The Rendlesham forest incident
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests