HALT TAPE TRANSCRIPT JULY 1ST 2010 - CJ PEARSON

[Xenobia]

FMG - To answer your question, Dynamic compression. Down to atleast -25 DB. I would suggest you do the same with inner-ear headphones as Storm has said, OR a good set of NS10's. If you can afford them, some Genelec monitors. The background noise produces almost none of the phrases he has mentioned, but you don't have to take my word for it - listen for yourself. As well as being an audio engineer who studied at the Gateway school of music, I am also a musician. But it doesn't take an engineer to just listen to the tape and make up your own mind.

Storm

Firstly, I apologise for boring you. My intention was never to waste anyones time but my own. My posts have been primarily for the benefit of anyone with an open mind. I only hope that people view your transcript through the eyes of a skeptic and come to understand, which I'm sure they already have, that the bulk of your additions can be interpreted however one wants when listening to the tape. It is my firm belief that you will truly believe your transcript as fact until proven there was no interrogation taking place in the room where the tape was being copied, which may never happen - so I'll give up on helping you to see otherwise.

To quote Jim Penniston's recent comment on your transcript on the Facebook Justice page: "I can't understand why someone would want to make things up like this. I know for a fact why there were gaps in that tape. It came from Chuck Halts mouth sitting in his office immediately after the incident. Very simple, but true explanation. All I can figure out about the person who came up with this stuff, is that they are suffering from ... that common but terminal medical condition, knowen as, “E-recto-myopia”. Having your head firmly placed up your ass! Everybody knows that can suffocate you eventually!"

While it is not my place to know the true location of your head, I feel that it is my place to draw attention not only to the inaccuracies of your additions but to the complete lack of groundbreaking knowledge gained from them. It is true that I may not have contributed much to finding justice for the 81st, but I strongly feel that muddying the waters with misinformation will not help matters in any shape or form.

Rather than attempting to assume control over any one's progress, I was simply trying to prolong the inevitable crowd of Storm Interrogation-tape conspiracy theorists that this bizarre pseudo-transcript could create. I never thought you were unwilling to edit your transcript in light of new discoveries and I believe that it is important it stay up - as a warning to others - not to read too much into nothing.

I will continue to analyze the background noise of the tape as a token of respect and personal curiosity, even going as far as continuing to desperately search for the patterns you claim to have found - I take your ideas seriously, as absurd as they may be.

I don't belong to any clique and speak as an individual with an invested interest in Rendlesham - just like all of you, I have read a phenomenal number of books that I hope will be properly plundered. I too hope we can all learn from this brief hurdle and can find the truth as swiftly as possible. Any belittling of effort, on your part or others, was purely accidental and if I have caused any upset - I am deeply sorry. Seedy is certainly not how I want to be perceived.

It's not personal - it's research.

John - you asked for my opinion, and i've given it. If you want me to refrain from posting on this site, just send me an email.

[John Burroughs]

What a joke! Storm you have gone on record saying a USAF Officer has commited a crime against another human being with out proof! Will what you have right now stand up in a court of law? If it does let me know because I guarantee all of us would take it to our Congreesman and hire the best attorney out there! Right now you feel somthing is there fine take it to the experts and lets see. But until then all you are doing is causing more harm than good! Nevils has been interviewed for I know what I saw and the Sci-Fi channel and never said a word about it happening to him. Now you will be having people trying to track him down like a dog! What if he says no is he a liar! I was asked if I was taken up into a craft or jumped on it and when I said no I was accused of lying or being a government agent! You say its being taken to a top notch lab then lets see what they say! But understand this you claim your trying to help us without verification there is nothing! I have spent hours trying to hear somthing to no avail! Again other than Sacha who is running around like she has seen the second comming of christ nobody else has steped up and said they can hear any of what you say is there!!! If you want to help lets see what the experts come up with! And Sacha I hope this gets done sooner than later! And what are you going to say if they come up with nothing! OOps sorry mean while you have accused one man of being involved in a crime and having the other man being hunted down like a dog with one of the quetions being asked him is if he pissed his pants while being beaten ! What you have done with this part is just as bad as what Ian has tried to do going public with out verification! I will be the first one to shake your hand if somthing is there!! The people involved in this incident want justice not a witch hunt!!

[Storm]

Xen, John, John B, anyone else

You are correct. It was a gross mistake on my part. The extra speech I would assume is just that. Random background hissing clicks and whirls overlapping. I am obviously wrong. And for that I am sorry. I do hope that I have not hurt your search for Justice John (Silvertop), I do hope that I have not wasted your time Xen, and John B, I think you need to learn to shut your mouth you big daft oaf. I will of course place this at the beginning of this thread instead of the transcript. I suggest those that are able pass word to those on facebook. I am not on that site nor want to be. Well I trust this settles things down and things can get back to normal. I will of course limit any input into this site as I am afraid it appears that I just unsettle the boat too much. And that's no good for anyone is it. Least of all this case. Sorry to all those affected. Craig.

Highlighted in RED to ensure no one misses it.

[FMG]

Well xenobia at least it is a very small step. Give that as a forensic report even a prelimery one to a copper and he acted on it like everyone is here and he would be talking to the IPCC faster than he could polish his helmet. Or maybe a more appropriate analogy for here based on modern British policing culture faster than he can turn the victim into the villan to get an easy result and up the government league tables.

[stephan]

guys, I don't know if this has been mentioned before. Trying to analyze the tape, too, I believe that Nevels says that he measures ''fourth becquerel''. Becquerel is a unit for measuring radioactivity. Halt says - as far as I could hear it - that they are quote ''comfortable good safe here''. That's at about time index 1:00 ... maybe the radioactivity level will increase when I continue with my analysis

edit: here's the audio: http://uploading.com/files/35am317e/1.wav/

edit2:

[stephan]

I know someone who has the first gen tape and he won't release it without a signed contract from the original owner.

with the original tape being 30 years old I fear it could have suffered over the years and that the quality has been drastically reduced. At least some of my music cassettes from the 80s were completely inaudidbe or the tape was damaged when I tried to play them a few years ago. If they really took pictures and if some of the events were filmed those footages might also have aged. I hope they made good copies every once in a while.

[tpreitzel]

Storm's interpretation of this particular recording is interesting indeed. However, the implication of this particular interpretation involves potentially criminal behavior so a huge disclaimer should have accompanied this interpretation until corroborated. * Yes, it's all water under the bridge at this point. Live and learn. I'll be honest, though. If this particular interpretation is eventually proven to have merit, some heads need to roll. At this point, Storm's published interpretation should simply be considered an opinion awaiting corroboration.

* Better left unpublished without peer review ...

[Deep Purple]

I wouldnt worry too much about the concept of criminal behaviour on this forum-- that is for the authorities to consider and they have a lot of questions to answer properley anyway.
We should be open on the forum to discuss any apsect of the case and our only worry should be if we incite a member into criminal activity which is most unlikely.
I would urge forum members to be civil to each other, if you have a different opinion say so nicely:- I disagree with because of xyz for example.
You have to remember say if the Rendlesham Incident has say 30 possible causes that the one you are working on has only a one in 30 probabilty of being correct.
Stay cool people.
Did something happen ----- yes yes yes

[Frank]

What is more interesting is what is NOT on the tape ..

Excerpts from posts by John Burroughs in a thread on this forum (emphasis is mine):
(source: http://www.rendlesham-incident.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=459&start=30)

When I got out there on Sat night there was light alls in a clearing and Halt team was past where we first had our encounter.
(…)
Halt saw something land which is why there are 2 sites. Remember Bustinza was not out there with me on the first night but was with Halt and me on the third night. I was told by Halt when I met up with them that something landed the third night and by Bustinza also.
(…)
He never said what landed just something landed he then pointed up in the sky and showed me the Blue lights that were flying around.
(…)
When I met up with his party everybody was visibly shaken up and stated they just had a unexplainable experience Bustinza was with them.
(…)
Andy: When has Halt ever admitted to seeing anything land and on the ground? Saw beams of light hitting the ground according to him, but to me that is not landing.
John: I have stated that’s what he told me when I met up with him on the 3rd night!


Adrian Bustinza tells his story in an interview by Ray Boeche on April 15, 1984
(Source: http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Woodbridge_01.pdf)

We started to search. … One individual had said that he had spotted the object -- like sitting on the ground. We proceeded to look and in the process found kind of like triangular tripods … burned into the [ground] at 3 different standpoints. … They were like it was a heavy object. They took radiation readings of the holes. And they got a radiation reading as I recall. Then I recall that we were walking through the woods and came upon the lights again. And that's when I first saw the object …

We got -- I think it was the flight chief [Sergeant Ball] and I believe another individual officer. We kept searching the area -- kind of like trying to follow the object. And it was moving through the trees. And in the process, we came upon a yellow mist about 2-or-3 feet off the ground. It was like dew, but it was yellow … like nothing I've ever seen before. … We kind of like ignored it. We were worried about the [other] object … to see if we could locate it again or catch up to it again …

We did see the object again. It was hovering low, like moving up-and-down anywhere from 10-to-20 feet -- back up, back down, back up. There was a red light on top and there were several blue lights on the bottom. But there was also like [a prism] … rainbow lights on top [and] several other colors of light. … It was a tremendous size. It even surprised me that it was able to fit into the clearing. A tremendous size -- and I use the word 'tremendous' carefully. It was a round, circular shape. I hate to say like a "plate", but it was thicker at the center than it was at the edge.


Statements of Adrian Bustinza in an interview with Larry Fawcett on April 20, 1984
(excerpts of the interview; source: Left at East Gate, emphasis is mine)

It was circular shaped … it looked like a pancake. It was thick in the middle and it would narrow out on the edges. I seen lights, all kinds of lights.
(…)
It wasn’t a humongous thing, but it was of a very good size.
(…)
…as big as a medium sized house I would say.
(…)
When it took off, it was like, hovering. It went up and, like, took off at about a forty-five-degree angle, and if you would have blinked, you would have missed it.
(…)
And we got a cold draft of air that lasted about a good ten seconds. You know, like you get a good blow of dust or wind. No noise though, I do remember that.
(…)
It turned, like, into a ball of light.
(…)
And it was like a glow around it, and it just took off.


Note how Adrian’s description of the craft taking off exactly matches that of Jim’s craft taking off two nights earlier. It also matches the general pattern of UFO behavior, by the way.

I kindly disagree with Deep Purple that there are at least 30 explanations for what happened in the RFI, based on the following fact: Both Jim and Adrian saw crafts up close and saw them take off in a way that is far beyond human technology.

Whether you like it or not, there is only one explanation for this: They are real and they are not us.
(unless you assume both men are lying, of course).