Conde Buran and Armold

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Conde Buran and Armold

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:28 pm

I have now created a page that if they join they can go right to and start answering question! Its completly out of Jim and My control and even Ian's. I will be standing by for them to drop in so we can get this party started!!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:31 pm

Here is a screen grab of the exchange Conde and I had last night! Since Ian won't post it I will.

Image

Image

Image

Image
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby ncf1 » Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:23 pm

Ian is not interested in the truth, plain and simple. If he was he would be there come Dec 28th and it is really a disgrace to be making speeches, etc off the back of something and then not turn up to the biggest congregation hitherto put together by the real witnesses who just want to get to the bottom of what they experienced. Its just, really, a disgrace. You either want the truth, or you want to stir the pot, thats all there is to it.
ncf1
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:25 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:32 pm

True Ian won't show up he feels like he can't trust his own country men. Ignis Halt once met with Ridpath and all Ian has done is take pot shots at Halt since. Ian won't meet us even said we would never come over well were coming and all ian can do is keep taking his behind the computer pot shots. As Ignis likes to say man up Ian stop hiding behind your computer!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:32 pm

Here is the deal were coming over in December plain and simple! If the 3 latest people who jumped in would like to come on the forum and tell there side and be open to questions that great. I would be happy to go head to head with them in any way shape or form. Ian won't show up on the 28th which saids volumes we will be there he won't. The thread has been created I await Buren Conde and Armolds arrival......
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby Frank » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:15 pm

John,

Funny thing is, Chris remembers going to the forest with Halt the second night (26/27) and states he was taking pictures when he was with Halt.

Conrad confirms Halt went out two nights (26/27 and 27/28), and we know Halt's tape was made the second night he was out (27/28).

Chris is nowhere on the tape, not mentioned by any of the other witnessess, and Nevels claims he was the one that took photographs on the third night. That makes me doubt if Chris was really there.

I saw that Chris being there on the third night was something that came out under hypnosis, or is it also a conscious memory John? If it only came out under hypnosis, we can't be sure it is actually true.

(http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1744&category=Environment , on the sixth black slide. If Chris thought this was a non-event it surprises me he went out with you on a cold winter night in the dark forest, while he was off-duty.)
Frank
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby Gordy » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:14 pm

Silvertop wrote: I was actually on RAF Lakenheath hanging out at the Law
Enforcement Desk at the time.

My flight chief asked me if I wanted to head out to Woodbridge to
meet up with Burroughs and see what was up. I grabbed the back gate
keys, and took the back way to RAF W/B. I met Burroughs at the East
Gate of WB. We left our guns with the guy riding with Burroughs and
drove to the end of the long access road. We left our vehicle and
walked out there.

[UK 8]******


Lakenheath is an hour to an hour and a half by road to BW/WB. I guess you drove to BW, got the back gate keys and took the short cut through Wantisden to W/B.
Gordy
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:51 pm
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby IanR » Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:39 pm

Gordy wrote:Lakenheath is an hour to an hour and a half by road to BW/WB. I guess you drove to BW, got the back gate keys and took the short cut through Wantisden to W/B.

I already posted this under the thread headed Chris Armold's comments:

"Lakenheath" is a mistype by Armold. He has confirmed to me that he did mean Bentwaters, which fits the rest of the statement about him going out the back way to Woodbridge. That is also the route that Halt took to get from BW to WB two nights later.

Ian
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby Frank » Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:25 pm

Frank wrote:John,

Funny thing is, Chris remembers going to the forest with Halt the second night (26/27) and states he was taking pictures when he was with Halt.

Conrad confirms Halt went out two nights (26/27 and 27/28), and we know Halt's tape was made the second night he was out (27/28).

Chris is nowhere on the tape, not mentioned by any of the other witnessess, and Nevels claims he was the one that took photographs on the third night. That makes me doubt if Chris was really there.

I saw that Chris being there on the third night was something that came out under hypnosis, or is it also a conscious memory John? If it only came out under hypnosis, we can't be sure it is actually true.

(http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1 ... nvironment , on the sixth black slide. If Chris thought this was a non-event it surprises me he went out with you on a cold winter night in the dark forest, while he was off-duty.)


Another indication that Chris Armold is talking about the second night (26/27) and not Halt’s night (27/28):

There was however, no army of USAF guys out in the woods.. No fleet of vehicles, no towed light rigs, just a half-dozen or so of us stomping around goofing off.

We know for a fact that there were light-alls present on Halt’s night – it’s on the tape (and a car horn).
Frank
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Conde Buran and Armold

Postby larry warren » Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:19 am

bULLSHIT , WE BROUGHT OUT lightalls, YOU CAN EVEN HERE THE BRIT COPS FROM THE SUFFOLK PD ARRIVE ON SITE !ITS ON THE TAPE AND CONTINUES TO BE IGNORED ! GOD DAMN ITS IN FRONT OF YOU FOLKS ! BY THE WAY THE SUFFOLK COPS GOT
CRUSHED ! BRING THE FORTH AND I WILL TELL THEM THAT !DEFO SAW WHAT I SAW ! IF IM LYING , SUE ME !
larry warren
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:02 pm
Location: england


Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest

cron