Table of Contents
Introduction
Motivation
The motivation of this development is the problem of the quality of UAP1) observation reports.
Proper reporting is always confronted to risks of undetected misunderstandings between the witness and the investigator.
A written description is ambiguous.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
A 3D animation can fully describe the visual and spatio-temporal aspects of an observation.
By simulating physics (even very simplified) or ensuring at least some internal consistency in the trajectories, the simulation can help test/reject hypotheses.
Technology allows now to add one more layer of realism, by simulating the events over the real environment, on site, in real time. By the use of Augmented Reality
The advance is threefold :
- quality of the parameters estimations
- direct validation method
- fidelity and realism of the reports
Purpose
Obtain better and more elaborate estimates of the observation parameters.
Opportunity
- The availability in 2021, on the consumer market of standalone (untethered) Head Mounted Displays (HMDs) for Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). These new HMDs do not even need to work in a fully controlled environment. They don't need “reference bases” or pattern targets to be placed around.
- The availability of free frameworks for the development of applications targeted on these devices. Namely : Unity 3d.
- all the reasons that motivated the invention of the SIMOVNI.
Some of the issues with SIMOVNI are solved, some appear. Many new things can be done that were impossible.
Solved with some HMDs
- unobstructed view solves the issue of the under estimation of angular sizes when looking through an opening (eyepiece of a refractor or binoculars for example)
The new or remaining issues with HMDs are developed below.
We expect better and more elaborate parameters estimations with such a tool than with the basic methods used by the investigators.
Philosophy
KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) and remain pragmatic.
One of our goals in this development, is to over specify and explore the theoretical/practical potential of the technology, yet limit ourselves to the most simple developments and proceed progressively and evolve the software based on the field results.
We thus also define a minimum implementation.
Before doing anything, we need to be sure we can obtain something of interest (see limitations).
Specifications
SIMOVNI history
Dans un article dans OVNI Approche #22 en 1980, Dominique Caudron décrit le Simovni. (Source : SCEAU / Archives OVNI)
Pierre Lagrange : “A propos des prétendus aspects psychologiques et sociologiques des témoignages d’observation d’ovnis”. Annexe consacrée à l'historique du SIMOVNI. https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/29_LAGRANGE_full.pdf
Pierre Lagrange fait référence à la fin à Inforespace de Décembre 1978, mais je pense qu'il fait référence au Inforespace Hors Série #3 de Décembre 1979 avec l'article (à charge lourde) de Dominique Caudron p14-p38.
Voir aussi
The paper trail shows Dominique Caudron was the first in France to build a practical device around 1974.
