LAEG Page 321

[Observer]

I was informed by an e mail just before last Christmas by a lady who was in the USAF [now working in civvy street] that we should be looking at a crime rather than all the theories we have been pursuing so far. I never said that this was the difinitive answer to our mystery or i catigorically knew the answer. I don't. There were aspects of her mail that i am not going to put on the forum as it was like the drug thing, dodgy. I may consider telling people by PM but i need assurances first.
I treat all new theories with a degree of sceptisism as i am not that silly to realise that it could be a hoax.
Having said that, i wonder why she told me this and why she picked me, was it it to throw us off the scent, i don't know?

My other point was, that failing all other explanations [man made] perhaps it was an extra terrestrial incident.

I don't wish to take part in on forum arguments as it all gets very negative and does not help.

Obs

[puddlepirate]

No need for argument but it is very frustrating to be led up yet another blind alley. One minute we are being encouraged to take the witness statements at face value and to accept what they say. Then almost in an instant the witness statements are put to one side in favour of something else that is, allegedly, very sensitive, highly confidential information from a reliable source - and then almost immediately that new information is dismissed as unsubstantiated rumour. It's impossible to get anywhere when things keep changing.......

Not only do I think the whole thing was a hoax created to wind up the LE/SP, I am now beginning to think we are being strung along purely for the amusement of others.

[Observer]

Ok, prove it was a hoax and let us all know how it was done.
Or is the hoax another blind ally?
Obs

[puddlepirate]

No, Obs, I don't have to prove anything. I can believe what I want to believe. The contradictory statements on this forum suggest to me - but perhaps not to anybody else - that the whole thing was a hoax or an elaborate diversion and now we are being strung along.

You have suggested in previous posts that it was (a) a hoax perpetrated by the 67th ARRS and involving the Apollo capsule - something which , if I remember correctly you were told by a Crew Chief when you visited the Rod and Gun Club at Bentwaters but were sworn to secrecy never to reveal what actually happened (the quote you gave was something like 'If I told you, you would never believe me') and (b) it was a crime - something apparently told to you by a reliable source who has to remain anonymous for security reasons or whatever.

I am not privvy to the inside information that you apparently have access to so can only go by what I have learned from this forum and elsewhere - and to be honest I have not read anything that convinces me it was not a hoax/diversion. Now you prove me wrong.

Incidentally, are you - or anyone else for that matter - aware of the unexplained 'touch and go' incident at Woodbridge in Feb 1980? And a similar incident at Bentwaters that occurred at almost exactly the same time in Dec 1980 as the Rendlesham Forest sighting?

[Wolf]

Define touch and go, I assume you are using it in the normal sense ie circuits and bumps. A touch and go of what? PM me.

Be excellent to each other...

V/R

Wolf