The blue orbs at the ranch that were mentioned also fascinate me. I realise that Admin has a different opinion on this, which i don't dispute ie illuminated dust particles picked up on the camera, but the ones at the ranch could be physically seen by the eye and not just picked up on a camera.
It's true that orbs are a very controversial topic. I don't really know what to think about it, because, I think it has been shown that sometimes it can be due to illuminated dust as Admin thinks, but I think I read also articles which demonstrated that it couldn't be only dust.
And furthermore, if you saw them with your own naked eyes, I understand you're doubtful about illuminated dust as the only explanation.
But I don't remember where I read those articles, and as I'm not an expert, I remain confused about this subject.
The second sighting was in Rendlesham forest one night as it moved amongst the trees on track 12 (now eight). I saw it and said to Brenda Butler, did you see that orb in the trees over there? She responded, oh yes, a red one, as it reappeared through the trees. Now i hadn't told Brenda what colour it was, but yes, the one i saw was red. Why didn't she say oh yes, the yellow, pink, blue, orange one etc? but she didn't. Therefore, arguably, could not have been figments of our imagination?
Yes, the question is why did she only see one orb and not the other ones?
Couldn't that be a phenomena due to weakness, fatigue of eyes due to the fact that this happens during the night ? When it's dark, we force our eyes to see as much as possible ... and may be a physiological phenomena could then happen ... but it's probably a stupid idea
Kindly,
Kalinoux
