by Daniel » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:35 pm
I can see the descrtuction of 'UFO' documents due to no historical interest for those who aren't interested. I even can see Asbestos contaminated documents being destroyed. What I don't get, after reading the Rendlesham related pages in DEFE/24/2026, is that the documents was part of a collection, a long with documents from other years, so if Asbestos was the assumption behind the destroyed documents then wouldn't the other parts of the collection get destroyed as well?
Page 184 has a memo that says: "[redacted] called. She thought we had agreed to write to [redacted] to say the files had been destroyed."
Page 185 Mentions: "Someone(now retired) was doing a project back in 1996 and may have used the files and misplaced them."
Right here we have documents that may have gone missing, but the easiest reply to give is that the documents are destroyed.