Why the Rendlesham files were destroyed

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

Why the Rendlesham files were destroyed

Postby IanR » Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:47 pm

Because they were of “no historical interest”.
http://drdavidclarke.co.uk/2011/03/05/172/

And in fact nothing of significance was lost anyway since it was duplicated in the existing released files.
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: Why the Rendlesham files were destroyed

Postby WizardofOdd » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:29 pm

Thanks Ian. This month's SUNlite pdf (found from the same link) is pretty thought provoking too! I shall continue to sit on the fence, of course :mrgreen:
WizardofOdd
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:05 pm

Re: Why the Rendlesham files were destroyed

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:17 am

http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.u ... 26-1-1.pdf Sure IAN this is why you and Clarke have no credibility. Take a look at pg 178 181 182 and 183 and tell me where it says that nothing of significance was lost. In fact on 181 it says files were destroyed at a unknown date following advice by blacked out. The MOD policy since 1967 was to not destroy any UFO files. And its interesting to see Clarke claims he knows what was in those files since he didnot work according to him for the government and didnot see those files so has no Idea what was on those files. Keep trying to push your koolade IAN its getting pretty sour....
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Why the Rendlesham files were destroyed

Postby slipX » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:44 pm

An amateur astronomer's persistent interest in a 'debunked' UFO case is a bit erm, unusual.

You can point your telescope to many thousands of stars that'll keep your interest occupied for years but instead you choose to return to this subject.

How very curious.
slipX
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:40 pm

Re: Why the Rendlesham files were destroyed

Postby Daniel » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:35 pm

I can see the descrtuction of 'UFO' documents due to no historical interest for those who aren't interested. I even can see Asbestos contaminated documents being destroyed. What I don't get, after reading the Rendlesham related pages in DEFE/24/2026, is that the documents was part of a collection, a long with documents from other years, so if Asbestos was the assumption behind the destroyed documents then wouldn't the other parts of the collection get destroyed as well?

Page 184 has a memo that says: "[redacted] called. She thought we had agreed to write to [redacted] to say the files had been destroyed."

Page 185 Mentions: "Someone(now retired) was doing a project back in 1996 and may have used the files and misplaced them."

Right here we have documents that may have gone missing, but the easiest reply to give is that the documents are destroyed.
Daniel
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:58 pm


Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest