THE article on BENTWATERS. . .

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

THE article on BENTWATERS. . .

Postby marantz » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:01 pm


THE article on BENTWATERS in this UFO periodical sums up this sham perfectly (page 7):

http://home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/SUNlite3_2.pdf

JUSTICE for the 81st? Yes. FOR the rest of us who have to put up with this crap ! WE won Best in USAFE for 1980 for christs sake!
marantz
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:17 pm

Re: THE article on BENTWATERS. . .

Postby John Burroughs » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:10 am

http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.u ... 26-1-1.pdf Sure IAN this is why you and Clarke have no credibility. Take a look at pg 178 181 182 and 183 and tell me where it says that nothing of significance was lost. In fact on 181 it says files were destroyed at a unknown date following advice by blacked out. The MOD policy since 1967 was to not destroy any UFO files. And its interesting to see Clarke claims he knows what was in those files since he didnot work according to him for the government and didnot see those files so has no Idea what was on those files. Keep trying to push your koolade IAN its getting pretty sour.
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm


Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest