History Channel

General discussion about the Rendlesham forest incident

History Channel

Postby Deep Purple » Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:19 pm

I watched the History Channel UFO files the other night by conincidence on the RFI.
They had JP who apparently was so distrurbed by the incident that he went out and took plaster casts of the indentation the very next day.
But when you think about it how many 20 something year olds just happen to carry the equipment to make plaster casts with them? Especially on a military base where personal storage is usually limited.
And why did he feel the need to take this stuuf if he even had it? Most people would just go out to the scene in day light to revisit it .
Seems so strange
Deep Purple
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:48 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby IanR » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:52 pm

You're right. He lived off-base, in Ipswich. He got some plaster and took casts of the supposed landing marks the morning after the initial encounter.

The casts contain pine needles. Therefore he must have taken them in the forest, as he initially claimed. But the "new and improved" landing site is not in the forest but in the neighbouring field where there are no pine needles.

So another change of story leading to another contradiction...
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Jan 22, 2011 7:16 pm

IanR wrote:You're right. He lived off-base, in Ipswich. He got some plaster and took casts of the supposed landing marks the morning after the initial encounter.

The casts contain pine needles. Therefore he must have taken them in the forest, as he initially claimed. But the "new and improved" landing site is not in the forest but in the neighbouring field where there are no pine needles.

So another change of story leading to another contradiction...


Truth is what stands the test of experience.
Albert Einstein Once again Ian you have no Idea what your talking about!!!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby IanR » Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:20 pm

John Burroughs wrote:Once again Ian you have no Idea what your talking about!!!

So which of those statements is untrue, please?

Ian
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:17 pm

IanR wrote:
John Burroughs wrote:Once again Ian you have no Idea what your talking about!!!

So which of those statements is untrue, please?

Ian


Keep walking!!! The keeper of the light house RIP!!!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:29 pm

John Burroughs wrote:
IanR wrote:
John Burroughs wrote:Once again Ian you have no Idea what your talking about!!!

So which of those statements is untrue, please?

Ian


"Forrest Gump: What's my destiny, Mama?
Mrs. Gump: You're gonna have to figure that out for yourself.


Keep walking!!!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:24 am

"Forrest Gump: What's my destiny, Mama?
Mrs. Gump: You're gonna have to figure that out for yourself.




One question for you Ian on the 26th while we were in the Forrest was that you on a Bicycle hiding in the trees with your funny little helmet on it was in the area where you claim the landing site was! If it was you I really do feel even more sorry for you than I did before!!
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby ncf1 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:48 am

if it was a genuine stackhat, it was most definately Ian. :D
ncf1
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:25 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby IanR » Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:14 am

John Burroughs wrote: One question for you Ian on the 26th while we were in the Forrest was that you on a Bicycle hiding in the trees with your funny little helmet on it was in the area where you claim the landing site was! If it was you I really do feel even more sorry for you than I did before!!

Nah, it was a cycling yeti.

Ian
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:59 pm

"IanR"]
John Burroughs wrote: One question for you Ian on the 26th while we were in the Forrest was that you on a Bicycle hiding in the trees with your funny little helmet on it was in the area where you claim the landing site was! If it was you I really do feel even more sorry for you than I did before!
Nah, it was a cycling yeti.

Ian
I'm not a smart man... but I know what love is.
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby IanR » Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:47 pm

John Burroughs wrote:I'm not a smart man... but I know what love is.

John, Forrest Gump was what's known as an idiot savant.

Regrettably, you're only half the man he was.

Ian
IanR
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:31 pm

IanR wrote:
John Burroughs wrote:I'm not a smart man... but I know what love is.

John, Forrest Gump was what's known as an idiot savant.

Regrettably, you're only half the man he was.

Ian
Wow you were able to come up with that all by yourself! I'm Impressed maybe there is some hope! Naw

The man who is know as the Light Keeper. A "wannabe" (slang for "want to be") is a person with an ambition to be someone or something that she/he is not. The term is mildly pejorative, intended to convey the foolish nature of the desire due to the incompetence of the "wannabe" to accomplish the goal.
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby marantz » Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:37 pm

THE new code reads as follows :D

“JIM, you are right, this IS a device from the future. We know you don’t understand binary so were transmitting Morse directly into your brain. This is a crucial message. You must alert the authorities about an incident that will take place around 20 years from now. The date will be September 11, 2001. Terrorists will attack America with hijacked airliners. For God’s sake, Jim, don’t sit on this! Only YOU can prevent it happening!”
marantz
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:17 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby John Burroughs » Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:43 pm

marantz wrote:THE new code reads as follows :D

“JIM, you are right, this IS a device from the future. We know you don’t understand binary so were transmitting Morse directly into your brain. This is a crucial message. You must alert the authorities about an incident that will take place around 20 years from now. The date will be September 11, 2001. Terrorists will attack America with hijacked airliners. For God’s sake, Jim, don’t sit on this! Only YOU can prevent it happening!”


is always wise to look ahead, but difficult to look further than you can see.
Winston Churchill
John Burroughs
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: History Channel

Postby AgentAppleseed » Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:21 am

One question for you Ian on the 26th while we were in the Forrest was that you on a Bicycle hiding in the trees with your funny little helmet on it was in the area where you claim the landing site was! If it was you I really do feel even more sorry for you than I did before!!





Ha ha ha ha, thats hilarious!!
At no time did I observe anything from the time I arrived at RAF Woodbridge.
AgentAppleseed
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:04 pm


Return to The Rendlesham forest incident

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest