Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- pensees:scenarii [2025/12/12 22:56]
lcdvasrm [Remarks]
+++ pensees:scenarii [2025/12/12 23:06] (Version actuelle)
lcdvasrm [Testable / Discriminating Predictions]
@@ Ligne 368: / Ligne 368: @@
 According to this scenario, since homo sapiens is clearly “dangerous”, it will not be given technologies or knowledge allowing direct contact. Perhaps a very remote future version of us might.
-It is not good for a civilization to grow technologically powerful while lacking global wisdom—either it self-destructs (ending “the computation” prematurely) or spreads havoc into the galaxy. Possibly we now stand at that juncture (("We are too 'technologed'": Ariel school case)). Therefore, the probe(s) might slow our tech progress with new beliefs, religions, or sects. Currently, we are still insufficiently advanced to cause havoc among the stars.
+It is not good for a civilization to grow technologically powerful while lacking global wisdom—either it self-destructs (ending “the computation” prematurely) or spreads havoc into the galaxy. Possibly we now stand at that juncture (("We are too 'technologed'": that message was communicated to a child in the famous Ariel school case)). Therefore, the probe(s) might slow our tech progress with new beliefs, religions, or sects. Currently, we are still insufficiently advanced to cause havoc among the stars.
 No ETs are scouting the galaxy.